Thursday, January 23, 2025

A Deadwood listicle!

What makes the western so intriguing and just straight-up instructive is its purity, a word I am loath to employ. But "purity" gets at how the western boils down the complexity of a nation state to its scrappy origins (and yes, that includes the lies told about said origins). No zip/tax codes, no gerrymandering, no urban planning, sometimes no dwellings of any sort, e.g., The Naked Spur (Anthony Mann, 1953), none of the contrivances of modernity that obscure like cobwebs the socio-legal carving up of space. The western is so spare that, at its best, it forces you to ponder why you are sitting where you are right now, a land acknowledgement avant la lettre. 

The benefit of a western series is that it has time to trace the processes by which initial land grabs congeal into a modern nation state. And HBO's Deadwood is peerless in that category. Despite the coruscating personalities on display (Al Swearengen is as attractive/repulsive as Tony Soprano), Deadwood makes it easy for once to think in the macro, to swerve away from the micro concerns of the characters and ponder the changes wrought by the newspaper, the railroad, the telegraph, etc. The latter accoutrements threaten to bring not only law and order but transformations in consciousness the residents of Deadwood could never have foreseen. My favorite moment in this regard is one lasting not even a minute, as evanescent as a stranger passed on the street. 

In Season 3, Episode 9: "Amateur Night," Samuel Fields (Franklyn Ajaye) visits the bank on his way out of town. He's chatting with owner/teller Alma Ellsworth (Molly Parker) but a line of customers has formed behind him. Alma eyes the line with concern as Fields babbles on. "I got a life to live of my own," he tells her. "As do all here in the camp," Alma responds tartly, causing Fields to notice at last the impatient customers snaking to the rear. "Sorry to hold you all up," he says sheepishly as he makes his exit. In an urban context, this exchange would prove too banal to narrativize. But to the denizens of a burgeoning 1870s town, waiting in close proximity to strangers is a new phenomenon requiring significant adjustments in expectations and behavior. It might even take on the contours of a novelty as it shades into loitering, a development which causes the ever-irascible Trixie (Paula Malcomson) to complain, "A lot of shitbags hang around a bank. Did you ever fuckin' notice?"

In short, Deadwood serves as the Prestige TV version of Wolfgang Schivelbusch's landmark 1977 tome The Railway Journey. As such, it doesn't lend itself well to listicling. The transformation of "our very perceptual experience of nature itself," to quote Wiki, takes precedence over individual gripes and local skirmishes. But below is an attempt to schematically rattle off the lows and highs of the series.

What's Bad About Deadwood (not much!):

1. Native Americans are, at best, a structured absence in Deadwood. The most prominent Native American character is a severed head in a box which Al uses for autotherapy like Yorick. Local tribes could have at least populated the margins as an ironic presence à la Beau Travail. Or they could have functioned as a nagging reminder of the bloody conquest of nature at the hands of white settlers.

2. Creator David Milch did not know what to do with his women characters. Once free of their respective pimps, Trixie and Joanie Stubbs (Kim Dickens) are unmoored and never self-actualized. Calamity Jane (Robin Weigert) should have been in every episode (see below). Alma has nothing to do in the 13-years-aborning movie. Etc.

3. Viewers could have used more glimpses of the indifferent Deadwood public along the lines of the bank scene described above. We know controlling the newspaper and, later, the wire is crucial for Al. But scenes of the public reading the paper would have driven home that importance.

4. No fault of Milch (from what I gather) but ending the series with Season 3 in 2006 left us unmoored. And while Deadwood: The Movie (Daniel Minahan, 2019) was a welcome wrap up, it came off as a preposterously tardy half-measure more than anything.

What's Great About Deadwood (not much!):

1. Every damn thing else!

Other notes:

Best character: Calamity Jane (below), easily. Robin Weigert, we are not worthy of your ability to remain barky and hammered for so long.

Character I initially hated but came to appreciate because he was so crucial to the narrative(s): E.B. Farnum (William Sanderson). What a worm, though!

Character who improbably turned out to be a hottie: Whitney Ellsworth (Jim Beaver)

Obviously essential character but one who remained a usually inert cipher: Sheriff Seth Bullock (Timothy Olyphant)

Ian McShane as Al let off most of the fireworks but don't sleep on this astonishing performance: Powers Boothe as Cy Tolliver

Time it would take you in each episode to require the emergency room if you took a shot every time some variation of "fuck" or even ("cocksucker") was uttered throughout the showy, Shakespearean dialogue: 20 minutes tops and that's a conservative estimate. More like 10 depending on the alcohol and one's tolerance.


Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, December 10, 2024

A Sopranos listicle!

SPOILERS!

 

Best character: Livia. Even more fathomless than Ruth Gordon's satanic coffee klatcher in Rosemary's Baby. I could never read the precise level of her deceit/evil. A virtuoso, hypnotic performance from Nancy Marchand even in Max Headroom mode. 

Second-best character: Janice. I've known so many people like Janice in my life and The Sopranos is the only show I know of to get the character right. The accuracy could split an apple in the next county. Aida Turturro, we're not worthy. 

Best episode: "Two Tonys" Season 5, Episode 1

Most infuriating episode: "Two Tonys"

Best season: 5

Most dour season (not a negative critique): 4, the first post-9/11 season

Season with the sharpest, most redolent costumes: 4, particularly Carm's.

Percentage of the series I remembered from when I first watched the thing 17 damn years ago: About 5% including almost all murders ever. 

Amount of times I screamed out loud: Lost count.

Weirdest moment: The freeze frame and wipe in "Cold Cuts" that no one involved with the production seems to remember. See it here. 

Secret comedic geniuses: The Sopranos kids because they get away with saying shit to Tony that would get anyone else whacked.

Grossest food: The tripe and tomatoes Richie brings Carm. 

Shows The Sopranos is better than (of shows I have watched in their entirety): Mad Men, Game of Thrones, The Leftovers, Succession, others.

Show I cannot say The Sopranos is better than since I am stuck in Season 2: The Wire but... (coughs)

Series that disproves the theory that I loved The Sopranos (and any other series) because I watched it with someone: Rectify (although I did watch it the second time through with the Mr.)

Books that I will read now that I've finished The Sopranos (again): Nick Braccia, Off the Back of a Truck - Unofficial Contraband for the Sopranos Fan; Dana Polan, The Sopranos.

What I would say to anyone who refuses to watch the show due to its thorough unpleasantness: Yeah, don't. 

Best ending to a series ever: The Sopranos

Where I will be going soon to enjoy some onion rings: Holsten's in Bloomfield, NJ

Labels: , ,

Saturday, January 06, 2024

A Game of Thrones listicle!

Lord of the Rings bored me to criminal distraction. The few Harry Potter films I saw failed to rise above standard-issue Oedipal hand-wringing. I'm not even all that ardent of a science fiction fan (if that matters), e.g., I cannot stand Star Wars even though I loved it when I was seven and the Death Star was my favorite toy ever. And I'm much more a film snob than a TV enthusiast even though I wrestle with the serial beast on the regular. So I was astonished by how much I adored Game of Thrones. I want to write more formally on it in the future. So herein please find a listicle that sums up my major thoughts/feelings on the experience. 

MASSIVE SPOILERS!

Coolest name (albeit a repulsive character): Septa Unella (played by an unrecognizable Hannah Waddingham)

Character I’m so not mad at for blowing up the Great Sept of Baelor because it wiped out the evil Sparrow religious sect and their leader the High Sparrow (played with icy, face-punchable cruelty by Jonathan Pryce) even though it also killed Loras and Margaery who was playing the Sparrows to get out from under their torture: Cersei

Great Canadian theorist whom I would like to apply to an analysis of the communication systems of Westeros: Harold Innis

Slight structural problem/Catch-22: Killing Ned Stark so early in the series. It was a Wun Wun-sized shock. But once you off your Tony Soprano, any character is fair game to get eliminated. Which is to say that while I didn't predict the Red Wedding, its shock was (somewhat!) diluted by the series' structure. Similarly, I thought Arya was dead for sure when she was stabbed by the Waif.

Funniest line of the entire series: Wun Wun the Giant to Eddison Tollett: “The fuck you lookin’ at?”

Single most redolent line of the entire series: Beric to Jon Snow: “I’m not fighting so some man or woman I barely know can sit on a throne made of swords.”

Second most redolent line of the entire series: Tyrion to Cersei: "Your reign is over. But that doesn't mean your life has to end."

Genuinely scary: the Night King especially the staring contest with Jon Snow after the wight hunt

Coolest voice: Davos'

Character I severely underrated early on because I thought Robb Stark was hotter and more confident: Jon Snow

Hottest character: probably Renly Baratheon

Most underrated (maybe even never rated) character: the officious clerk Samwell encounters when he first gets to the citadel 

Favorite character: Choosing a favorite character goes against what I loved most about the series which was a critique of power-besotted individualism. I would've chosen Tyrion early on but he got too emo towards the end. I adored Samwell and Brienne of Tarth so I was happier to see them on the small council with Tyrion than whoever wound up on whichever throne. Is it cheating to choose Ghost? He's such a good boy!

Aspect I could've used a bit more on but not too much for fear the series would tumble into world-building dreariness: the Iron Bank of Braavos

Level of anger I experienced re: the later seasons and the finale: Almost non-existent. As a non-fan of fantasy and world-building, I probably enjoyed the series overall more than its most foam-drenched fan-detractors.

Shorthand I used to describe locales and characters because I couldn't remember them all: Quality Court (the place where Arya trains to be all face pulling and badass), Celine Dion ([visits Wiki of Westeros to find name] Ellaria Sand), Pedro Pascal (whoever he played), Daktari (Dothraki), etc. 

Number of predictions that proved incorrect: Many, mostly concerning Arya. I thought she would transform into a White Walker to kill the Night King or Jamie Lannister to kill Cersei. And I thought Bran would do something more than just send out ravens and get all moony.

Number of George RR Martin books I've read: 0

Number of George RR Martin books I may read: 1

Number of George RR Martin books I will probably finish: 0

Remotely related (please don't start a genre border skirmish with me) type of book I'd like to read now that I've finished Game of Thrones: The Once and Future King by T. H. White 

Masterpiece YOU should watch after you've finished Game of Thrones: The 47 Ronin Parts 1 and 2 (Kenji Mizoguchi, 1941-1942)

Numbers of episodes I've currently seen of House of the Dragon: one and digging it 

Dreary franchise I may now finish in the spirit of open-mindedness, Joan grant me the strength: Lord of the Rings


Labels: , ,

Monday, June 07, 2021

Mare of Easttown (Craig Zobel, 2021)

Yes, it was gripping. Yes, the acting was superb. Yes yes yes. But if writers/directors continue to indulge in the pitfalls of serial television narratives, then I should be able to review them with a rubber stamp. Mare of Easttown (to paraphrase what I wrote about Breaking Bad) builds up the intensity of single scenes but ignores how those events (especially the violence) impact the characters over the entire story arc. They just absorb the blows and move on. (Mild spoilers ahead but I'll keep it vague.) 

Take the scene in which Becca flies into a rage after seeing her ex-girlfriend Siobhan kiss Anne. Becca storms out of the house, knocking down Helen, Siobhan's grandmother (!), in the process. Helen goes to the hospital despite Mare claiming she suffered just a bump on the head. Mare checks in on Helen for one brief moment and then...the. incident. is. never. discussed. again! Becca completely disappears and it's as if the event never took place. It merely takes up (or, in an unkinder cut, wastes) time. 

And if that scene isn't monumental enough to ponder, then how about the death of a major character in episode 5? Sure, there's a bit of mourning. But by the end of episode six, it's as if that character had never existed. More time has been taken up such that every scene starts to feel like arbitrary filler, e.g., a mother sent on a wild goose chase to retrieve her kidnapped daughter. So then why was Mare of Easttown seven episodes? Why not 70? Why not 70 minutes? Can I get 7 minutes? Great television should be more than taking up time. No? Ok.

Grade (and it's quickly dropping so I better get this in now): B-minus


Labels: , ,